Cedric Pioline vs Greg Rusedski Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Pioline vs G. Rusedski

Cedric Pioline
FRA
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
3
Win
4
Played
1
Win
56
Age
52
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'4" (193 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
118
Best Rank
29
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$398.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Greg Rusedski
GBR
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
3
Win
4
Played
1
Win
56
Age
52
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'4" (193 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
118
Best Rank
29
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$398.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-To-Head: Pioline 3 - 1 Rusedski
They have played 14 sets in total, with Cedric Pioline winning 9 and Greg Rusedski winning 5. The last match between Cedric Pioline and Greg Rusedski was at the U.S. Open - New York, 28-08-2000, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cedric Pioline getting the victory 6-7(4) 3-6 6-4 7-6(6) 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Pioline | 3 |
Rusedski | 1 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R2) U.S. Open - New York(08-28-00)
Cedric Pioline
6
3
6
7
6
Greg Rusedski
7
6
4
6
3
(SF) The Nottingham Open - Nottingham(06-14-99)
Cedric Pioline
6
7
Greg Rusedski
4
6
(QF) ABN/AMRO World Tennis Tournament - Rotterdam(02-15-99)
Greg Rusedski
7
3
7
Cedric Pioline
6
6
6
C. Pioline vs G. Rusedski H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $397,980 |
55.25% (400-324) | Career Total W/L | 59.84% (438-294) |
2 | Grass | 0 |
1 | Hard | 0 |
0 | Indoor | 1 |
5 | Titles | 15 |
3 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Pioline vs G. Rusedski Match Preview
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cedric Pioline has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Greg Rusedski has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cedric Pioline, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Greg Rusedski has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cedric Pioline has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Greg Rusedski has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cedric Pioline has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Greg Rusedski winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cedric Pioline has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 36/ 23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 107/ 98). Greg Rusedski has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 86/ 38), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 29/ 52).
- Player level: In the last year, Cedric Pioline has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Greg Rusedski has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Cedric Pioline winning 3 times and Greg Rusedski being victorious 1 times. They have played 14 sets in total, with Cedric Pioline winning 9 and Greg Rusedski winning 5. The last match between Cedric Pioline and Greg Rusedski was at the U.S. Open - New York, 28-08-2000, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cedric Pioline getting the victory 6-7(4) 3-6 6-4 7-6(6) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cedric Pioline and Greg Rusedski have played a deciding set 2 times, with Cedric Pioline winning 1 times and Greg Rusedski 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 5 tiebreaks against each other with Cedric Pioline winning 2, and Greg Rusedski 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cedric Pioline has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Greg Rusedski has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cedric Pioline has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Greg Rusedski has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cedric Pioline has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Greg Rusedski has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cedric Pioline vs Greg Rusedski Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Pioline vs G. Rusedski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
9 | Sets Won | 5 |
81 | Games Won | 70 |
0:0:0 | Avg. Match Time | 0:0:0 |
50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 50% (1/2) |
50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Pioline 0%, Rusedski 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pioline 0%, Rusedski 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Pioline 0%, Rusedski 0%.
C. Pioline Recent Matches Played
G. Rusedski Recent Matches Played

C. Pioline vs G. Rusedski Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
55.25% (400/324) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.84% (438/294) |
54.45% (1047/876) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.08% (1097/825) |
51.42% (9716/9178) | Games Win/Loss | 52.01% (10250/9457) |
52.20% (107/98) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.54% (164/121) |
54.46% (122/102) | Clay Win/Loss | 35.80% (29/52) |
57.53% (126/93) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65.70% (159/83) |
59.21% (45/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 69.35% (86/38) |
0 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
0 | Aces Total | 374 |
0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 227 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
285.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 6.6 |
0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2107/3532) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (1528/2096) |
0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (702/1417) |
0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (85/223) |
0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 33% (1079/3318) |
61.29% (76/48) | Slam W/L | 53.40% (55/48) |
51.35% (76/72) | Masters W/L | 46.72% (64/73) |
53.33% (8/7) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (14/10) |
55.31% (224/181) | Main Tour W/L | 66.06% (288/148) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
57.69% (15/11) | Challenger W/L | 41.18% (7/10) |
54% (311/578) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (366/596) |
61% (85/139) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 54% (72/134) |
54% (155/285) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (260/466) |
49% (129/264) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (143/252) |
84% (382/319) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (427/354) |
16% (382/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (427/72) |
23% (342/79) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (305/84) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.45
W2
2.75
06:30 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.53
W2
1.52
06:00 PM 19/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.68
W2
2.06
06:00 PM 19/09/25
Prediction
W1
3.1
W2
1.33
06:30 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
3.2
W2
1.35
04:50 PM 19/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.75
W2
1.99
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
06:00
H2H 3-2
08:00
H2H 3-0
17:10
H2H 1-1
08:00
H2H 2-0
08:00
H2H 1-0
Tennis Events This Week
Chengdu Open - Chengdu
China
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou
China
Laver Cup - San Francisco
United States
Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Austria
Columbus Challenger
United States
St. Tropez Challenger
France
Targu Mures 2 Challenger
Romania
Villa Maria Challenger
Argentina
M15 Fayetteville
United States
M15 Hurghada
Egypt
M25 Guiyang
China
M25 Londrina
Brazil
M25 Setubal
Portugal
M25 Takasaki
Japan
M25 Tamworth
Australia